Building industry wants better protection for its workers, but there’s no law requiring it

Building industry wants better protection for its workers, but there’s no law requiring it

The law is designed to prevent the industry from firing or threatening to fire workers based on their race, gender, religion, age, disability, age at first sexual intercourse, sexual orientation, veteran status or national orig카지노 사이트in.

The labor secretary, Thomas Perez, confirmed for the first time Monday that the Obama administration has approved the use of the federal law.

Perez said the rule was “essential” for protecting domestic violence victims, like those who were assaulted by their partners, and to prevent employers from retaliating against workers who raise safety issues or challenge hiring practices. The secretary’s position could allow the Department of Labor to create an enforcement body that can issue citations and take enforcement action, Perez said.

But the Obama administration has said the law is needed to curb the harassment of undocumented immigrants who could lose their employment contracts after their applications are denied. Labor officials said in a statement that the administration was reviewing the law and was considering other ways it could help workers.

It would allow the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which does much of the government’s tracking of employment data, to identify the number of people, based on race, who are not employed and not entitled to Social Security and Medicare tax credits. The information will then be publicly disclosed — and workers and employers will be able to identify those not covered.

“This is an important first step in ending wage discrimination against victims of domestic abuse and sexual assault,” Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), the bill’s sponsor, said in a statement. “We are also reviewing the impact and potential legal risks on the federal government as a whole.”

Catherine Lhamon, a University of California-Davis labor law professor and form더킹카지노er federal judge, called the proposed provision a “gut check” to ensure protections for people without legal representation who live in fear for their safety or have a legal right not to be fired or disciplined.

“The reality is that th바카라ere are millions and millions of people who are covered by federal law who were never covered by the law,” she said. “It would be a gut check to stop discrimination against them.”

Advertisement Continue reading the main story

But Jessica Vaughan, president of the National Conference of State Legislatures, argued that using federal laws to protect the public was “not the solution to working people’s rights.”

“Unions and public employee unions both stand to lose money by using these provisions, not just on domestic abuse bu